Skip to content
Military Heritage
Military Heritage

Military Heritage of the Martin-Haile Family

  • Welcome
  • Contents
  • Contact
  • Resources
Military Heritage

Military Heritage of the Martin-Haile Family


Warning: Undefined variable $id in /home/hdgqfbfu/public_html/military/wp-content/plugins/jquery-lightbox-balupton-edition/jquery-lightbox.php on line 155

Warning: Undefined variable $link in /home/hdgqfbfu/public_html/military/wp-content/plugins/jquery-lightbox-balupton-edition/jquery-lightbox.php on line 160
flagbanr.gif

The Southern Loyalist

Posted on January 3, 2008September 27, 2015
image_pdfimage_print

 

PART III. The Fighting Southern Federals

What was the impact of the Southern Loyalists? Three factors need to be considered; the direct contribution of the men as soldiers to the Union cause, the resources expended by the Confederacy to counter the threat, and finally, the loss of manpower to the Southern cause. Taking these in reverse order, the loss of manpower to the South was probably fatal to its cause. While estimates of the numbers differ. Current estimates that as many as 100,000 white men of the South served the Union cause as Federal forces and local defense forces. This was more men than Lee or any other Southern commander ever had under arms at any time. In addition, thousands of other troops were diverted from the main armies to control the loyalists. Cavalry patrols. How much difference would the cavalry patrols that tried to interdict the flow of manpower have made to the cavalry-poor army of Johnston?

Consider the impact of the 30,000 East Tennesseans who joined the Union. Had they joined the Confederate forces, this would have amounted to a swing of 60,000 men, and when the 10,000 Confederates who were required to keep East Tennessee in subjugation are added in, a difference of 70,000 men results.

Finally, there is the direct contribution. There is no question that some of the southern units were hard-fighting, crack units, while others were of questionable value. The Tennessee Unionists units were of solid quality, as were most of the Virginia units, who saw fighting almost from the beginning at Philippi and Romney under McClellan. The First Mississippi Mounted Infantry rode with Grierson in his famous raid through the heart of Mississippi. In the movie “The Horse Soldiers” with John Wayne and William Holden, the Southern-speaking men (Ken Curtis) were authentic and represented the First Mississippi. It is true that when Pickett executed 22 men of the First North Carolina USV, he did, in fact, cut the heart out of some units, particularly those containing “galvanized Yankees.” Still, these men could, and did, perform valuable duty in less exposed positions.

Other Unionists such as the First Alabama were dependable units, just as hard-fighting as any Ohio, Maine, or Pennsylvania troops. The Myth of the Lost Cause demands the loyalists be branded as poor soldiers. Interestingly, many of the Unionists served in cavalry units, and early in the war, the quality of the Union cavalry in general was very poor. But by 1864, the Federal cavalry were, in general, at least equal to the Confederates. The hard-riding Blue troopers of Phil Sheridan scattered Jeb Stuart’s plumed cavaliers and killed the famed cavalryman. While they never tamed “that devil Forrest”, the Union cavalry in general, and the First Alabama did humble Joe Wheeler and Wade Hampton.

 

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Civil War General Civil War Story

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

Joseph M. Bailey Memoirs of the Civil War

Posted on January 3, 2008September 27, 2015

THIS STORY WAS WRITTEN OVER FORTY YEARS AFTER THE WAR ENDED This story was written as a result of a number of requests of grandchildren to tell them stories of the War between the States. As I was a poor story teller, I promised to write for them something of…

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
Read More
Civil War
Warning: Undefined variable $id in /home/hdgqfbfu/public_html/military/wp-content/plugins/jquery-lightbox-balupton-edition/jquery-lightbox.php on line 155

Warning: Undefined variable $link in /home/hdgqfbfu/public_html/military/wp-content/plugins/jquery-lightbox-balupton-edition/jquery-lightbox.php on line 160
arc.gif

11th Tennessee Infantry

Posted on February 1, 2008March 3, 2024

Organized at Camp Cheatham June 1, 1861; Confederate service August, 1861; reorganized May, 1862; formed Companies “F” and “K” of the 2nd Consolidated Tennessee Infantry Regiment which was paroled at Greensboro, North Carolina May 2, 1865. FIELD OFFICERS Colonels-James E. Rains, George W. Gordon, James A. Long. Lieutenant Colonels-T. P….

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
Read More

Shiloh – Order of Battle

Posted on January 28, 2008September 27, 2015

  April 6-7, 1862..–Battle of Pittsburg Landing, or Shiloh, Tenn. No. 134. — Organization of the Army of the Mississippi, April 6-7, 1862.(*) FIRST CORPS.(+) Maj. Gen. LEONIDAS POLK. FIRST DIVISION. Brig. Gen CHARLES CLARK. First Brigade. Col. R. M. RUSSELL. 11th Louisiana. 12th Tennessee. 13th Tennessee. 22d Tennessee. Bankhead’s…

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
Read More

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Backup of your WordPress installation – Backupl
  • 484th Bombardment Group
  • 15th Air Force
  • 11th Tennessee Infantry
  • The War Comes to Wolf Bayou
  • Valley Campaign – Order of Battle
  • Fredericksburg – Order of Battle
  • Maryland Campaign – Order of Battle
  • Peninsular Campaign – Order of Battle
  • Seven Day’s Battle – Order of Battle

Categories

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 Military Heritage | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes